Roll on over to Reasoned Audacity for a round-up of what some on the Left are trying to pull in regard to Supreme Court nominee John Roberts. Apparently, he's gay. Huh. . . I thought having a wife of many years and children usually steered people away from concluding THAT. Even if a Republican president DID nominate a homosexual judge, why would the left attack him on it? Isn't it a mantra of the left to have the right people in the right governmental position regardless of sex, race, religion, creed, or lifestyle? Isn't trying to prove that someone is gay in order to discredit him just a bit, well, homophobic? If this is how some people are going to try to discredit or hurt John Roberts' Senate confirmation process, then my earlier point about having little ammunition with which to attack him is on it's way to being proved.
Update: Charmaine at Reasoned Audacity has a further post on this issue as well, including her rebuttal to some of the feedback she's gotten.
No comments:
Post a Comment